“Because generative AI was so new, there wasn’t a lot of domain knowledge on the open market. We needed experts in language modeling who not only knew how existing tech works, but how to learn about what was possible. It just made sense to work with Tribe.”

“Our experience with AI before Tribe was pretty much nothing—we were really a zero to 60 type of deal. Tribe was instrumental in kicking off that process. We were able to get deep expertise right away and build a working prototype that helped us see what was actually possible.”

“With a myriad of LLM and AI and machine learning capabilities out there, it is very, very hard to figure out what the best approach is. Tribe will help guide you. They’ve been there, they’ve done it, they understand what other companies are doing. They’ve had experience there—and that experience is not something that is readily available. There are very few companies that understand how to build solutions for companies that are looking to utilize AI.”

“One thing that has surprised me working with Tribe is their ability to understand a new domain space as quickly as they do. I’ve been working in the legal education market for 12+ years now. I have a depth of knowledge there, but as you explain a specific domain space to Tribe, they’re able to really understand that quickly and then apply other experiences they’ve had in other industries to that new problem space.”

“Tribe AI’s team members are smart and truly care about understanding our users and the problems we’re trying to solve for them. It’s really unique to have partners who can wrap their heads around not just the technology but also the business; and reflect on how one can leverage the other.”

“Tribe provided a real investment in understanding our business. They served as AI experts evaluating our current processes and challenges. They helped us answer the question ‘where do we think AI could come in and help?”

“Working with Tribe was one of the best decisions of my career. Tribe’s team members weren’t just order-takers aimed at pleasing us. They offered conflicting and compelling insights and really pushed the project forward with a critical perspective. That confidence to ‘argue’ for improved outcomes is invaluable.”